Skip to entries
sunkcost.dating

Lexicon ·

soft-cap dating

noun phrase

Stated meaning
Pausing new outreach to concentrate on one person while keeping at most one other conversation open, so that compatibility can be judged without losing every other lead.
Operating meaning
One person in focus and one conversation kept warm in case the focus does not hold, which is a rotation of 2 described as restraint.
Origin
Issued by an AI chatbot, in a conversation with the narrator, as a named strategy headed 'Soft Cap / Focused Funnel'. The cap is a sports term for a limit that may be exceeded in limited circumstances.

Soft-cap dating was not heard in the market. It was issued to me by an AI chatbot, in a conversation about my own dating, as one of several named strategies, under the heading “Soft Cap / Focused Funnel.” The instruction was to “pause swiping and new outreach,” concentrate on one person, and keep “at most one casual conversation open.” The cap is borrowed. In professional sports a soft cap (opens in a new window) is a limit that “may be exceeded in limited circumstances,” and the NBA’s best-known circumstance is a player the team already has.

The strategy came with a citation. It was said to satisfy “optimal search theory by preventing tunnel vision early, while cutting options before choice overload sets in.” Both theories exist. Optimal stopping (opens in a new window) rejects roughly the first 37% of candidates and then takes the first one better than all of them, and Johannes Kepler is recorded as having investigated 11 candidates for marriage over 2 years. The rule assumes the searcher knows in advance how many candidates there will be. Choice overload was tested in a meta-analysis of 50 experiments and 5,036 participants (opens in a new window), which found its overall effect “virtually zero.” The funnel cuts options ahead of an effect that, on average, measured nothing.

Under load, a soft cap of 2 is 1 person and 1 contingency. The contingency is told nothing about its status, and the focus is told nothing about the contingency. The arrangement depends on the second conversation staying casual, which is a decision only one of its 2 parties knows is being made.